Merry X-mass

Posted on 23 December, 2010 by mark

There is a very good reason why He said that the way which leads to His Truth is very narrow and “few that be that find it.” The Truth is not popular, it does not sell much in the way of the world’s products, and it doesn’t tickle the ears.

He was not born at Xmas, nor in the dead of winter at all. Scripture makes this clear repeatedly, through multiple witnesses, to those with “eyes to see”.

There is a reason why the Adversary, and his commercialized minions and symbols — from ‘yule logs’ to ‘Satan Claws’ — have so been able to “wrest” such a false ‘holy-day’: it was never His to begin with. Read Jeremiah 10:1-10, and the many other warnings in places like Deuteronomy 7:25-26, the story of Ezekiel 8 and 9, and most of Deuteronomy chapter 12 and 13.  And any encyclopedia will tell you whose birthday falls just after the winter solstice, and where each of the legion of pagan customs originated.

And the issue is NOT simply that He was not, and indeed could NOT have been born in December*, much less on the winter solstice on the same supposed day as Mithra. The problem is that He clearly says NOT to do such things, much less claim that they please Him in any way.

If He is in fact the Master, and we desire to be told “well done, good and faithful servant,” why do we so often persist in IGNORING what He says we SHOULD do, and keeping the Appointed Times He specified that we were to “keep forever“, while instead doing things He says are abomination to Him, and calling those pagan celebrations “holy-days”?

For those who know the Truth but can’t understand why He would take no delight in having His Word perverted, take a listen to a cute, simple example:

How would YOU feel about it?

And why do you think what has happened to “Christ-Mass” is so easy to explain?

—————————

*  A bit of Bible research, associated with the birth of John/Yahuchanon “the Baptiser” supports the belief that the Messiah was actually born in the fall, almost certainly during the Feast of Sukkot (aka “Tabernacles”) — where all of His people traveled to Jerusalem, and stayed in a “suka” (a word coincidentally often translated into Olde English as “manger”).

Posted in torah, Uncategorized, Yahushua HaMashiach | Tagged , | Comments Off on Merry X-mass

To Serve the People

Posted on 1 December, 2010 by mark

Submitted for your approval…

A story of the Near Future…in the Constitution-free Zone.

The New Amerikan Gestapo known as the TSA, which is alleged to stand for something promising a little temporary security in exchange for a few remaining God-given Rights, has been getting some bad press lately.  More and more of the Sheeple seem to be waking up to the fact that taking porno shots of children, old folks, and even nubile young women — and rudely groping those who refuse to submit — is nothing but Security Theatre.

Now it seems that the widely-reviled (by the State-Loving Press, anyway) “National Opt-out Day” may not have been as much of a “bust” as the sycophants were gloating.  Obviously, most of those who were not inclined to being treated like cattle simply refused to travel by Government-Run Airlines…and opted instead to either stay home, or go by car…while that option still exists.  Reports reveal that most of the offending Naked Body Scanners were simply turned off during the High-Profile Days…thus avoiding any embarrassment for the Transport Sexual Abusers, and, coincidentally, their victims as well…at least briefly.

But sometimes the Truth comes out anyway.   The following is a bit of extrapolation…based on current trends and a bit of whimsy:

The phone rings  in the office Benjamin deHamas, editor of the Washington Verdad — the nation’s most-respected news source.   “Ben, listen up.  Remember that misguided protest against TSA back when we first started installing the Enhanced Body Scanners, and a few miscreants actually objected to how we were taking care of them?  Well, there are evidently still a few Neanderthals out in fly-over country who don’t trust us, and are actually not doing their Duty!  Well, not voluntarily, anyway.”

“I find that hard to believe, Madam Secretary, but what did you have in mind?”

“We have decided to take a new direction now when it comes to Security.  After all, if we can’t protect people, who can?  We’ve even got a great name for the new Policy…it’s called ‘To Serve the People’, and we’d like your help again in announcing the initial phase-in.”

“Of course…we are always happy to help, as you know.  Catchy title, by the way…it even sounds kinder and gentler.”

The problem seemed to be that even those people who appreciated the New, New Enhanced Screening were starting to grumble about how long it took to get to work, or the store, now that even local mass transit and most interstate highways involved waiting in sometimes long lines for the search.  In order to streamline the process, and to demonstrate the degree of Customer Sensitivity at the TSA, the new process would extend the much-envied “Trusted Traveler ID Program” not just to VIPs, like pilots, bus drivers, Licensed Press, and Members of Congress, but even to NON-government workers!  First would be those who had already applied for Special Hardship Permits, of course…but eventually everyone might be offered the opportunity to “opt out”!

Free trips to the very playground where Officials convened to consult with the Federal Reserve itself would be offered to the first few rounds of selected  applicants.  “Get a background check, a blood test, and a free all-you-can eat trip to Jackson Hole as a reward…just to show the traveling Public that we are REALLY here ‘to serve the public’!”

“Wow, Madam Secretary, that sounds tremendous.  I hear the food there is really something to dream about, too.  Almost makes me wish I could sign up again myself!”

“Don’t worry, Ben.  I’m sure we can arrange a Press visit for you early on as well.  Just help us inform the People about what we have planned.”

After his staff meeting, a reporter who the famous editor knew only as “Mark” stopped him by the door, and asked him if he had seen the New Policy Guidelines.   “No,” he responded. “What does it matter?”

“Because they seem to be classified.  Even the front-line TSA Search Duty proctors haven’t seen ’em.  Doesn’t that seem a bit odd?”

“Aw, come on, Mark,”  deHamas said.  “It’s National Security, for cryin’ out loud.  Of COURSE it’s classified.”

“Sure, Mr. deHamas.  That’s my regular beat, and I know their procedures, but my sources always get me advance copies anyway.  How else can we have the stories ready in advance of the procedures?  But this is different.”

“You’re starting to sound a bit like one of those internet extremists,” he quipped.  “Next thing I know, you’ll be quoting the Bible!”   Mark didn’t find that funny.  “OK, see what you can find on it.  But don’t waste too much time; we’ve got an announcement to put out.”  And that was that, or so he thought.

As both the Secretary and the Pravda editor expected, the new Policy was a big hit…and applications swamped the system.  It didn’t hurt that Jackson Hole had a great reputation as the place where the elite came to enjoy the finest cuisine the nation had to offer, especially since food prices had gotten so high after the collapse of the dollar.

The streamlined “Trusted Traveler Program” turned out to be simplicity itself as well.   A single, almost painless injection took care of not only the insertion of the tiny, tamper-proof, National ID device itself, but simultaneously allowed the ‘wonder-chip’ to transmit DNA information to a nearby reader.  Everything about the signup process was not simply easier, but so much more “customer friendly” than the intrusive, but necessary, “Strip and Bend Over Duty” (or “S-BODY”) that those people who had not yet “Embraced the Change” still had to struggle through, whether it was at airports or public transportation, or at the Roadside Duty Stations.

Ben deHamas, of course, was tapped to cover the first set of non-VIP “Trusted Travelers” allowed to go through the new process, and be given their Internal IDs.  He was literally headed out of the office, briefcase in hand, en route to the VIP Concourse at Obama Global Airport, when Mark stopped him at his door.

“Don’t get on the plane, Mr. deHamas!  I finally got a copy of the New Policy book!  It’s not what you think!”

“Good grief, Mark.  What could be the problem with a program called ‘To Serve the People’?”

He could see the fear in his staffer’s eyes as he answered.

“It’s not a customer service manual,”  he said.  “It’s a cookbook!”

——————————————–

*  Apologies, obviously, and a tip of the hat, to the late Rod Serling and his famous Twilight Zone episode, called “To Serve Man.”

This little cautionary tale is intended as an only somewhat tongue-in-cheek reminder that the “veneer of civilization is very thin”.

And, given that the Constitution has already been “served up on a platter”, what could be that much more shocking?

Posted in Come out of her...., Terror State | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Taking off the gloves… part 2

Posted on 29 November, 2010 by mark

Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers;  and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. — II Timothy 4:2-4

Last month I wrote that it was time for the “gloves to come off” when it comes to speaking the Truth of YHVH “boldly” when we, as watchmen, see that the “sword is coming upon the land.”  Recently the land of the formerly-free upped the ante:  the velvet glove of pretense was removed, to reveal a brutal iron fist within, as the aptly-nicknamed Transportation Sexual Abusers (TSA) at major airports began to force many would-be travelers to choose between an ogling of their Naked Body Scan and a brutal groping of their privates…because it would make the gullible “feel safer”.  There was a time when any five-year-old girl hearing such a ridiculous claim knew it was a lie, and would not have fallen for it.  But the “many” are again deceived, while hundreds of stories of horrors and atrocities abound over the internet.  Meanwhile, the mainstream press steps up the propaganda to those who (obviously) have nothing else LEFT to hide.

The Bible repeatedly uses terminology like “to reveal the nakedness” in the context of forbidden acts, and things which cause shame.  Truly, this month the nakedness of Police State Amerika has now been revealed to the entire world.  The World’s Biggest Lie may now well be, “No need to trust in God any more…only the Almighty State can keep you safe.”  So shut up, get in line, raise your arms, and follow orders, in other words.

But what continues to concern me as well is the response of far too much of the State-created, Caesar-approved, 501c(3) “church” and its licensed “Clergy Response Team” apologists.   All too often the same people who preach that God’s “Law is done away with!” will turn right around and claim that Romans 13, however, means that you must now be “under the law” of men instead.  Somehow the obvious contradiction eludes those whose salary seems to depend on which master writes the check, and offers the tax-exemption.

We have been warned (Matthew 24, Mark 13, etc) that the deception to come would be incredible.  The fact that the world’s reserve currency is a fraud, an abomination, and repugnant to the Constitution of the land which prints it, surely qualifies as a major ‘deception’, as does the theatrical depravity at airports which masquerades as “safety”.  The ForeclosureGate fiasco, where literally trillions of dollars in increasingly worthless mortgage “securities” have been passed off as investments, has been called the greatest financial fraud in history…which is saying something, given the scale of recent financial fraud!  But the plagues which inevitably must follow the unraveling of such Big Lies are barely just beginning.  History shows that wars, both economic and eventually the bloody kind, generally follow.  As do false saviors.

I recently received another in what has become a series of emails from a Christian evangelical clergyman whose first name is evidently “Doctor”.  He seems to take great offense at my public writings critical of the lies of such torah-less-ness, and which apply the prophecy of Jeremiah 16:19 (that we have “inherited lies, and things wherein therein there is no profit”) to modern Amerika.  How can I continue to emphasize how important it is that those who understand His Truth repent, begin to “come out of her”, and to be separated from the coming plagues.  I was asked pointedly whether there wasn’t “anything else” that I could talk about, and advised that it evidently wasn’t loving to warn people about lies, or suggest they separate from lawlessness…much less, evidently, to “convince, rebuke, or exhort.”

I disagree dramatically…and, in this particular case, not even very respectfully.  Those who lead or teach are held to a higher standard (Hosea 4:6, Matthew 5:19, etc).  The point of “blowing a trumpet” when the sword comes upon the land, according to Ezekiel 33, is to warn those whose lives are in danger.  Quite frankly, as I read that missive, I could not help but be reminded of the story of a “pastor” in Nazi Germany who was concerned that his “sheep” might be disturbed by hearing the screams of passengers riding the rails to a nearby concentration camp…and thus advised the church choir to “sing louder”.

Our Father warns those charged with such responsibility, and who FAIL to do their duty, that, “his blood I will require at your hand.” How much more so, then, those “blind guides” who not only preach “lawlessness”, but teach others to ignore the warning?   The “dust from our sandals” is not the only Witness against such perfidy.

We have been informed (Amos 3:7, etc) that YHVH does nothing without first declaring Himself through His servants, the prophets.  The essential message of every prophet in Scripture is ultimately almost identical:  Repent (or turn, in the Hebrew t’shuvah) from “wickedness”, and return instead to Him, lest the inevitable consequences of rebellion follow.  Learn to walk again in obedience to His “torah”, the instruction that He gave to us, in love, so that we might be blessed.  Both history and Scripture teach that the outcome for every single nation which forgets that essential Truth is the same.  And the warnings today, I contend, have NEVER been so clear.

“For when they say, “Peace and safety!” then sudden destruction comes upon them…But you, brethren, are not in darkness, so that this Day should overtake you as a thief.” —  I Thessalonians 5:4-5

Sometime “love” means telling people the Truth…even when it doesn’t soothe “itching ears”.

“One who turns away his ear from hearing torah, Even his prayer is an abomination.“ — Proverbs 28:9

Posted in 501c(3) "Church", Come out of her...., Terror State, torah | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

The New ‘Biggest Lies’

Posted on 9 November, 2010 by mark

The alleged “controversy” about AIT (who cares what it is supposed to stand for) at airports and, increasingly, evidently hidden in vans on Amerikan streets, fascinates me.  It’s not just that the Naked Body Scanners are an abomination from the pit of a police state hell-on-earth, however, it’s how a disgusting majority of the sheeple comprising the still-traveling public continue to submit supinely (well, standing with arms outstretched, anyway) to the abuse.

But there are encouraging signs.  A few vocal individuals, like former Express Jet airline pilot Michael Roberts, have been willing enough to say “No!” to such invasion, even at the cost of their job.  Many, many others have simply decided to avoid commercial air travel whenever possible — although the response of the Terror State Administration and those who fund them has simply been to “bring the show on the road.”

Others of us fight such Evil in additional ways.  Ridicule is such an alternative.  While questioning the Gestapo-inspired Thugs manning the turnstiles at an airport is guaranteed to result in missing a flight, and probable arrest — to do so in print or in person  will still probably just get someone put on a list, for now.

So, in the spirit of speaking the Truth “boldly”, as we all ought to, I offer the following observation:

Remember when the Number One “Biggest Lie” in America was, “I’m from The Government and I’m here to help you”?

Now there are two more:

“Naked Body Scans are good for you,”  and

“We don’t save the Kiddie Porn pictures…or your wife’s.”

Ridicule sometimes works when Right and Reason don’t.

Posted in Aviation, Come out of her...., Terror State | Tagged , | Comments Off on The New ‘Biggest Lies’

Torah 101

Posted on 7 November, 2010 by mark

 

I often note that people who won’t attempt to read what Scripture has to say about a number of things will sometimes take a look at what the Torah says about economics…particularly when it impacts their wallet.  Things which we can point out to others can, in other words, provide us with examples of WHY what the Bible has to say about life are important, and worth the time to study and consider.

But there is another situation which many of us have, or will, encounter.  That is the individual who claims to “believe” in Scripture, but has become disillusioned or confused, due to what might justifiably be called the “Jeremiah 16:19 Syndrome”, because that prophet so accurately described those who realize we have been deceived:

“O YHVH, my strength and my fortress, my refuge in the day of affliction, The ‘goyim’ shall come to You From the ends of the earth and say, “Surely our fathers have inherited lies, Worthlessness and unprofitable things.”

When people DO begin to “come out” of the world, and the world’s ‘church’, it is important that we be able to give an account for what we believe, and why – based on what we have learned.  “Torah 101”, then, refers not so much to WHAT it contains, but how we show those who have begun to question those “unprofitable things” WHY that study…from Bereshiet (Genesis) onwards…is so important.

As it turns out, we have been taught about “another Jesus” (II Cor. 11:4) who supposedly “did away with” His own torah, or “teaching and instruction”.  We were taught “doctrines of men” in “Sunday school” — just as our Messiah called the Pharisees “hypocrites” for doing (Matthew 15:7-9, Mark 7:6-8) — instead of what is actually Written.  We were taught to accept pagan ‘holy days’ — that He called “abominations” —  in place of the Feasts which we were instructed to keep forever!

And yet the natural reaction of most people — and perhaps especially those who thought they were doing things in obedience to God — is anger, when they realize that so much of what they have been taught is not only wrong, but amounts to calling good, evil, and evil, good.  How do we show those folks who DO truly want to study and believe what His Word really says that so much of what the Caesar-created, state-approved, tax-exempt “church” teaches is just plain wrong?

We quote the “Word Made Flesh”, Himself.  We show them that when He said that He does not change, and keeps His Covenants forever, that this is exactly what He meant. (Malachi 3:6, Hebrew 13:8, etc.)

One of the first such teachings, of course, is in the famous “Sermon on the Mount”, the verses in Matthew 5:17-19, which have been so often misquoted to say something that He did not:

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Torah or the Navim (prophets). I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
For I say to you, that until heaven and earth pass away, not so much as one jot or one tittle will pass from the torah until all is fulfilled.

There are two key points to understand. The first is that His teaching was not in English, nor in Greek, and that when He said that not the smallest part, not “one yod or tiddle,” will pass from His instruction, the word He used was “torah” — not “law” or “nomos”.  And the second thing is the combination of qualifiers He chose!   His instruction cannot have changed, much less been “done away with”, because “heaven and earth” obviously still exist!   Finally, note that the phrase “torah and prophets” is a well-understood, specific reference to what everyone listening knew was the Written Scriptures.  The rest of His sermon makes that point over and over again as well, since he repeatedly used the contrast between what “you have heard it said” — just as we, too, have heard things taught in error — as opposed to what is actually Written in His Word!, THAT is, in fact,  what He taught as “one having Authority”  (Matthew 7:29).

In fact, much of His ministry focused on correcting the false doctrine of the Pharisees — the legalistic clergy of that age — because they violated His Word by “adding to” it so many “burdens” that they did not have the authority to change! (Deut. 4:2, Deut. 12:32, etc.)  He called them “hypocrites!” (and worse, even — see the whole of Matthew chapter 23) for doing exactly that.

There are many other testimonies from the apostolic Writings which make the point.  But several have always seemed to me to be good introductions to the vital distinction between man’s traditions, and YHVH’s Written instruction.  It was never His torah which was “nailed to the execution stake”, but the indictment for the sin of rebellion to Him!  And the “law” which we are not to be “under” is the false burden of legalism, paganized ‘tradition’, and the “doctrines of men” which undermine His instruction for us on how to live our lives:

“…you have made the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition.  Hypocrites! …in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.'” (Matthew 5:6-9, and similarly Mark 7:6-9)

“But why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do the things which I say? (Luke 6:46)

The word “law”, translated all too often without discernment from that Greek “nomos“, is a big part of the problem.  Yahushua was very careful to distinguish between His “commandments” and the imitation “law” enforced by those who claimed authority to correct what He Wrote.  Whether it was the Pharisees who added over 1500 hundred specific regulations concerning the Sabbath alone (whereas what is actually Written can be counted on our fingers!), or the Popes who literally “changed times and seasons“, getting rid of His appointed Sabbaths entirely and replacing them with forbidden pagan festivals — the principle is the same:  their “law” is NOT His!

Even Shaul (Paul) was very careful to explain those differences to pagan converts who were woefully ignorant of His Torah, unless, unfortunately, they are compared to most of the modern “Church”.  Chapter one of the letter to the Galatians makes the point very well…but only if one reads it with understanding of the Torah.

There are legions of examples in Scripture…from His healings on the Sabbath, where He explicitly violated those “traditions of the elders”, but NOT His own Word, to the lesson of Acts 15:21  (the “Big Four” were a starting point, not the goal), to literally the entire letter to the Romans.  Each of us should strive to understand, and be able to explain to those who have become disillusioned, how what they have “heard it said” was ‘done away with’ differs from His “Law,” as it is actually Written.  That means starting, literally, from Bereshiet — “in the Beginning”.

Once people have a solid grasp of why our Savior called those who tried to rewrite His Word “hypocrites”, the caution of Peter concerning those who try to “twist” the writings of Shaul (Paul) — the consummate Torah scholar — will make sense!  (II Peter 3:15-16)  The pieces all fit together when we are able to recognize what He  meant by, “If you love Me, keep My commands.”   (John 14:15)  After all, it is our “reasonable service”, and He hasn’t changed a word of ’em.

Posted in torah, Uncategorized | Tagged | 5 Comments

IF we are really close to the ‘endtimes’…

Posted on 18 October, 2010 by mark

Are we coming up on the ‘endtimes’?  While I have a suspicion or two, it is admittedly impossible to really KNOW, until sometime, well…later.

But we are to “know the season”, and also to remain “teachable”.  So, I’m open to being shown.

But IF, and I stress the ‘IF’ part, that is indeed what is coming, what does it mean for us, now?

I heard a comment from a friend on the subject that I like:

“You cannot POSSIBLY prepare for what is coming.”

BUT…there are things we certainly can do:

Prepare to be teachable.

Prepare to be led.

Prepare to be obedient.

Prepare to be able to help others.

(Learn, live, lead.)

and PRAY to be counted worthy to escape what is to come.

In other words, enter via the “strait gate” and be prepared to be led via the narrow way.  You won’t find it on your own, and probably wouldn’t believe what lies along the path in the interim anyway…yet.

Posted in Come out of her...., Uncategorized | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Bookends

Posted on 13 October, 2010 by mark

I saw an editorial cartoon this week which gave me a chuckle, more because it seems to indicate that even a few folks who generally seem clueless to what is happening in the world may be starting to at least have a few questions.  In the living room of a glass house sat a man and wife, obviously concerned about all of the satellites, surveillance vans, men with binoculars and wiretaps, and other police state paraphernalia which was trained on them.  The caption read, “I thought transparency was supposed to apply to the GOVERNMENT.”

The cartoonist missed the a trick, however, because the man and woman were clothed:  he forgot about the backscatter millimeter wave naked body scanners, which have now migrated from airports to mobile tax-supported vans.

All of which is an introduction to the topic which was already on my mind anyway, right from Bereshiet/Genesis 2:25, “And they were both naked, the man [adam] and his wife [isha], and were not ashamed.”
As it turns out, however, they might be considered to have been ‘covered’ by YHVH, while they were in obedience to Him and under His care.  It wasn’t until a bit later (v 3:7), after eating of the fruit of the tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that ” the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they [were] naked…”

Note the sequence of events carefully here; we’ll get back to the comic in a minute.  While the original man and his wife were under obedience to their Creator, they were naked before Him, but not not ashamed.  But when they went into rebellion against Him, and broke the single commandment they had been given, they were exiled from that Garden.

I often note the beautiful symmetry of many teachings in Scripture.  Some prophecies are cyclical, and foreshadow events which repeat, often on multiple levels and multiple times.  Some events are foreshadowed.  Some aspects of that concept have even been described with the summary “as with the fathers, so the sons”.  Both Abraham and his son, for example, committed almost identical acts of putting their wives at risk by denying (or at least “fudging”) their relationship.  And the generation which sees the ‘Greater Exodus’ may well recognize the prophetic parallels of the one our ancient fathers saw.

But there is a ‘bookend’ to that story of the original garden, which this concept of ‘nakedness’ before a master seems to help expose, it you will pardon the multiple puns.

The ‘prince of this world’ is not very original.  He copies the true Creator.  He, too, has commandments, demands tribute, and offers his own “blessings and curses” for obedience and resistance.

Modern slaves of Caesar, or “Big Brother” if you prefer, are also required to stand naked before their chosen master.  They submit to his searches, his wiretaps, his economic surveillance, his ‘naked body scans’.  And most of them don’t even know they are naked (see Rev. 3:17, for example.)

What struck me when I thought about that editorial cartoon of the ‘man and his wife’ sitting in a glass house, who didn’t know that they were ALSO naked before their false ‘mighty ones’, was that this, too, was a “bookend” in Scripture:

The first adam (literally Hebrew for ‘man’) was naked, but not ashamed, arguably because he was covered by his Creator.  But when they rebelled, and ate of the forbidden fruit of knowledge, they were put out of the garden. (1)

Modern adam is also naked, and clothed instead only in ignorance.  His ‘covering’ by the prince of this world has more in common with the “Emperor’s New Clothes” than the white garments described in Biblical prophecy.  And the new “garden” is a fake as well…from the ‘knowledge’ infused at the Government Indoctrination Centers and media Ministries of Propaganda, to promises of earthly salvation via tree-hugging rather than fruit consumption.

Everything about the original story has now been turned upside-down…except those two Original Lies.  (2)

Adam was put out of the Garden of Eden.  We must choose to COME OUT of the imitation.

________________________

1)  The Hebrew word used in Gen. 3:23 is shalach, meaning send out, or put away.  It is the very same word later used as part of the process for divorce.

2)  “You shall not surely die”, and “you can be like Elohim…” (Bereshiet/Genesis 3:4-5)

Posted in Come out of her...., torah, Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

When it is time to “take off the gloves”

Posted on 2 October, 2010 by mark

We seem to live in a culture which literally lusts for the opportunity to “take offense”.  The mere expression of the understanding that some things are wrong because Scripture says so in a national forum seems almost guaranteed to send someone into a fit of anger…often accompanied by cries that such a belief is, at a minimum, intolerant, probably prejudiced, and therefore worthy of suppression or retribution.  Somehow the irony of that position is lost on them.

While politicians, pundits, and police pay lip service to “tolerance” and “free speech”, the truth is that we now inhabit lands where such things no longer seem to apply.  At least not to everybody.  For example, sodomy and the licensing of homosexual “marriage” MUST be “tolerated”, and of course subsidized by the socialist “safety net”, while “Fundamentalist Mormon” polygamy conversely justifies the kidnapping of children.  Hate must be properly focused, in other words, or else it somehow magically becomes a thought crime, but that which the Bible calls “abomination” enjoys the blessing of the State.

Modern society, in short, seems to take particular offense at whatever is Written in Scripture by a YHVH Who is no longer allowed in Caesar’s schools, or his courtrooms.  Even many self-described “Christians” are so consumed with the idea of NOT being “under the Law” that they have failed to notice they are no longer “under” the Bill of Rights either!  If the “Law” has truly been “done away with”, that damage extends to whole nations, and not the “old testament” alone.

But even those who seek to be like the Bereans, and search out the Scriptures for ourselves, are not immune from taking offense, or being criticized for pointing out certain teachings from His “teaching and instruction”.  It is very important that we not “teach as doctrine the traditions of men”, particularly when such “additions” to His Word are based on forbidden pagan practices.

I’ve been wrestling a bit lately with the concept of “blowing the trumpet” of warning (Ezekiel 33:6 and 3:17-19) and the claim — generally made by ‘believers’ to whom they hit just a bit ‘too close to home’ — that it’s simply not “loving” to quote certain verses.  After all, feelings might be hurt  by things like Matthew 7:21-23, where He is quite blunt with those who practice lawlessness.  Or Matthew 5:19,  or, well, just about any of them where our Mashiach uses the word “hypocrite” (over and over again in Matthew 23, for example.  Oops; He also called them things like “vipers” or worse).  Certainly we all want to show “love”, and demonstrate such concern for our brothers and sisters the way He did.  But is it “charitable” to ignore what He really said just because it might offend some who aren’t ready for the “meat” of Scripture, or might not even recognize that the things He calls “unclean” aren’t really even meat at ALL?

And are we in fact failing to be obedient, and speak His truth “boldly”, when we fail to speak forthrightly to our brothers and sisters about important issues because someone might take offense?  There comes a time, I submit, when we are called to “take off the gloves”.

After all, Scripture repeatedly advises us that those whom He loves, He ‘chastens’.  Shouldn’t we be prepared to do likewise, ‘in love’?  And what does that really mean?  Likewise, Read Deut. 13.  Should we not be ‘offended’ — at least a LITTLE — by what offends Him?  I contend that He Wrote His instruction down for us for a very good reason.  Scripture is full of examples of men and women who were “zealous” for YHVH, and who were likewise uncompromising in doing what He asked of them…but offers very few praises for people who caved in to the “political correctness” of their day or “tickled the ears” of the gullible.   Saul and Ahab, among others, seem to be fairly representative of the current crop of “leaders” familiar today.

But the prophet Eliyahu (Elijah) sticks in my mind as a man of YHVH who demonstrated the kind of “tough love” that the people of Israel needed during a time of incredible idolatry, and the weak and corrupt leadership which festered as a result.  I Kings chapter 18 tells the story.

In spite of threats against his life, Eliyahu came boldly before a king who was evidently surprised to see him.  “Is that you, O ‘troubler of Israel’?” His answer did not seem to indicate too much concern about giving offense.  “I have not troubled Israel, but you and your father’s house have, in that you have forsaken the commandments of the LORD and have followed the Baals!” When Eliyahu then literally commanded that the king gather the 450 prophets of Baal, and the 400 prophets of Asherah for a showdown before the people of Israel, Ahab complied.

In one of the most stark choices offered in all of Scripture, the prophet evidently didn’t worry too much about giving offense to those he sought to save from idolatry, either.  ‘ “How long will you falter between two opinions? If the LORD is God, follow Him; but if Baal, follow him.” But the people answered him not a word. ‘  (I Kings 18:21)

Then, of course, Eliyahu “took the gloves off” when he turned his attention to the pagan priests.  Did he “offend” the priests of Baal?  After all, he not only sarcastically ‘mocked’ them and their false god, but later made sure that not even one escaped.

Eliyahu’s blunt language and powerful demonstration literally revealed to the people of Israel Who was their Elohim, and what was NOT.  Interestingly, the Hebrew word transliterated “ahav”, meaning “love”, has the pictographic meaning of “to reveal the Father”.  What a wonderful rendering of what it means to love as He would have us understand it!  A father’s love must include chastening when necessary, and balances both encouragement and discipline.

There is definitely a time for those of us who claim to follow Him to “take the gloves off”, and most of us understand that evil often triumphs when good men do nothing.  But those who are so afraid of giving offense, or being called “intolerant”, will not even take the first step of speaking the Truth from His Word “boldly” when the “sword comes upon the land”.  We must not fear the criticism of men when the alternative is to consider that, as watchmen, we may be called to account for our failure to sound a warning.

Posted in Come out of her...., torah, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 6 Comments

All “slavery” is not equal!

Posted on 30 August, 2010 by mark

Most of us who have been around the “Hebrew Roots movement” for very long , or who may refer to ourselves as some variant of “Torah-observant believers”,  have heard a sordid collection of arguments all too often trotted out to demonstrate our folly.  Those who long to show us that all such “Old” stuff in the Bible has been “done away with” – or “nailed to the cross” — have several favorite examples of Scriptures to “wrest” out of context in order to claim that such a “God” was not only wrong, but Politically Incorrect.  Among the clear favorites of the scoffers is what they call His approval of “slavery”.

After all, in our enlightened, egalitarian, “modern” world, society has now clearly “evolved” FAR beyond whatever some ancient Writings claim that an allegedly “angry”, “jealous”, and — horror of horrors — “patriarchal” YHVH may have once said.  And, of course, if He was wrong about such important things as supporting slavery, and the presumed “inferiority” of women by daring to create us “male and female”, with bodies suited to fulfill the roles He designed us for as well…why would ANYONE believe Him?  The logical conclusion is to wonder just how much of His “Law” is left which DOES still apply?

So, it is important that we be able to debunk — roundly, unequivocally, and directly from Scripture — any and all such claims.

And since marriage and sexuality is easily one of the most important, and most-discussed, relationships in all of Scripture (and I won’t claim to be able to distill all of His teachings on the topics into a single short article!) we’ll start with the “easy” one – slavery.  And I’ll start with an observation, as well…that those who most vehemently seem to REJECT His “teaching and instruction” somehow seem to be the most hopelessly ‘enslaved’ – and to be equally ignorant of their own condition!  Perhaps that is why the advice to “let those who falsely believe they are free rattle their chains” so resonates in post-Biblical Amerika.  After all, if we understand that those whom He makes free are “free indeed” (Yahuchanon 8:36), then what, conversely, about those who deny Him entirely?

Take a look at Exodus 21.  Isn’t it just a bit remarkable that immediately after delivering His people from brutal bondage in Mitzraim (“Egypt”, under Pharoah) and then giving them the Ten Words or Commandments  (which outline just how these folks are to live and relate to Him and one another in that new freedom) that virtually the next topic He selects concerns what it means to be a “slave”?

Observe a couple of very interesting things about  the section.  When a “master” gives his servant a wife, and the servant eventually leaves, the wife and any subsequent children belong to the master! (v. 21:3-4)  Don’t think for a minute that Caesar (and his servants in “Child Protective Services”) fail to understand that meaning, even if those who take that master’s “marriage license” fail to understand it!

Scripture also contains many other verses which outline treatment of “servants”, and specify various “do’s” and “dont’s”.  Those ordinances show clearly how YHVH’s instruction concerning servants (who were often indentured because of trespass, negligence, or debt) very much differs from the cruel slavery of the pagan cultures which surrounded them.

But the next verses in Exodus 21 are perhaps even more telling, given that so many people now often unwittingly serve “another master” —  which Yahushua cautioned against.  A servant may say, “I love my master, my wife, my children“, and thus “I will NOT go out free,”  so a process is detailed by which that master “shall bore his ear through with an awl” into the doorpost of the house, “and he shall serve him forever.”  (I suspect that many men who today want to wear an earring probably don’t understand the symbolism of that particular age-old “tradition”!)

Before I gave much thought or study to the instruction of the Torah, I assumed that verses five and six simply referred to a “master” was not unkind, and thus treated his ‘slaves’ well. But a good friend, who happens to be a well-known Orthodox rabbi, once told me of an ancient midrash on the subject, which I found fascinating:  No, such a man is NOT a “good master” at all, but a FAILURE! Why?

Because he had FAILED to teach that individual how to live as a free man!

The whole point of teaching a man how to be a servant was to prepare him not for slavery, but to know how to live according to Torah; how to be a head of his own house, a leader, and a contributor to his community.

I see it now in a broader sense still.  Why does our Savior say that we must learn to serve before we can learn to be “kings and priests” for Him?  There is in fact a TREMENDOUS difference between “slavery” and what it means to be a “bondservant to the Most High” — as most of the apostles understood clearly!  (Check out not only Shaul’s claims from the first line of the letters to Titus and the Romans, but the introductions from II Kefa [Peter], Yakov [James], Yahudah [Jude], and Yahuchanan in Revelation!)   Whether the metaphor is to learn how to be a good Bride to Him, or a subject of the One True King, or a bondservant of the Most High, the message is still that we must LEARN what it means to walk in obedience…or else live as slaves.  Whether modern slaves understand Shaul/Paul’s teachings or not, that is ultimately what it means to be in “bondage to sin”, or rebellion to Him.

The real irony, and the only most “difficult” part of the teaching, if you will, is that to be “free indeed” we must first become servants.  Because the only way we can really learn how to walk in true freedom is by surrendering, voluntarily, in obedience to Him.

The key issue is choice, but a deception exists even on that score.  The real choice is not merely between “freedom” and “slavery”, but between “bondservice” to Him, and “slavery” to the world.  That choice is determined by WHICH master we will choose to serve:  either YHVH, or the ‘prince of this world’.  And while being only “self-serving” may seem like an alternative, it ultimately defaults to the latter.

America’s Founders, and those who came before them, understood the concept well.  William Penn said that those “who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants”.  Yahushua [Joshua] defines the issue in verse 24:15 of the Book bearing his name, when he says, “Choose this day Whom you will serve“, and informs us of the choice for “me and my house“.  The Savior emphasized that very point when He responded to Satan’s offer of power over all this world by quoting that, ” ‘You shall worship YHVH your Elohim, and Him only you shall serve.'” (Luke 4, Matthew 4)

There really is ONLY one true Master Whom we should serve – and the choice is ours to make.  We should be able to explain to those who do not understand why our choice of obedience to Him and His “teaching and instruction”  (torah, of course, in the Hebrew) is not “legalism”, or much less bondage, but simply demonstrates that we understand what He (and the apostoles as well!) were teaching us to proclaim:  that “I love my Master,” and desire to “serve Him forever”.

That is what John 14:15 is all about as well:

 

“If you love Me, keep My commands.”

Posted in Come out of her...., torah, Yahushua HaMashiach | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

False prophets, and black-robed priests of another god

Posted on 9 August, 2010 by mark

This week’s “news” and this week’s traditional Torah portion (Re-eh, including Deuteronomy chapters 12 and 13) — as so often happens when it comes to regular study of Scripture — seemed to have an almost stunning connection.

In a week which saw an openly “gay” California judge discover yet another “right” in the Constitution which YHVH Himself calls an “abomination”, the admonition of Deuteronomy 13 to avoid being snared  by false prophets seems particularly poignant.  San Francisco Federal Judge Vaughn Walker claimed in his own variant of trashing the last verse of Deuteronomy 12 that he struck down California’s “Proposition 8” ban on state licensing of homosexual “marriage” because he saw no “rational basis” for “singling out gay men and lesbians” for denial of the Almighty State’s blessings.  “Indeed,” the would-be Lawmaker pontificated, the “evidence shows” that the Amendment — passed by a landslide 70 percent majority of voters in that presumed “democracy” of a state — “does nothing more than enshrine” in that state’s Constitution “the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples.”  Motivated solely by “animus”, he continued, the law played on “fear” that parents might end up with “children who are not heterosexual.”

What struck me about all of the debate, all of the news coverage, and ALL of the “ruling” was the utter blindness of what is laughably called “both sides” to the “elephant in the room”, or the Bible that was notably absent from it!  There was a LOT of mention of “traditional marriage”, and some reference to generic “religion”, along with “history”.  But if there even WAS any power in the Universe superior to Big Brother and His Almighty Power to license and (RE-) define “marriage” – you wouldn’t know it from this “decision” or any of the coverage of it.  Just try a search for the word “Bible” on the mass of media spin, or the 136-page ruling.  If you find the Word at all, it will almost certainly be in respect to some “history” that we are now far too sophisticated (or “rational”, to use Walker’s favorite disparagement)  to care about;  that so-called “animus” that no doubt springs from the “hate crime” mentality of believing the Bible.

How far we have fallen from a nation where once there was unanimous agreement* that certain Truths were “self-evident” and that God-given “Rights” came from a Power superior to any government of men, to one where there is “no rational basis” for paying Him even any attention.  What fallen men now call “law” and twist so badly that evil is now called good is not only sanctioned, but subsidized.

The message here, in other words, is not about “homosexuality” per se, or the trap of allowing Caesar to “license” that which YHVH ordains and has given us the rules for.  But there may be no better illustration of just what the Torah has to say about why YHVH prohibits “adding  to” and “subtracting from” His “Law” than this latest “enticement” to “go and serve other gods, which neither you nor your fathers has known”.

Even a cursory reading of chapter 13 of Bemidbar, or Deuteronomy, will show just how vehemently He detests those who attempt to deceive His people into serving other “mighty ones”  (or elohim in the Hebrew).  But verses 6 through 11 are perhaps the most graphic (as well as the ones most likely to be on new lists of “prohibited verses” for the  State-licensed, Caesar-blessed 501c(3)  Sycophant “Faith-based” Church in the near future).  Even if it is our beloved brother, or the “wife of our bosom”, or our lifelong friend, who says to us that we should serve these other mighty ones, “of the mighty ones of the people who are all around you”, we are not to “agree with” them, “listen” to them, “pardon” them, conceal them or even spare them.  Serious stuff indeed**.

Now, I know from experience that some reading this are skeptical…and no doubt think that referring to those who construct ‘new law’ from a courtroom bench as “black-robed priests of another god” is too extreme. After all, never attribute to “conspiracy” that which is adequately explained by “incompetence”. But one does not have to be a ‘conspiracy theorist’ to realize that the Bible is True, or to observe that there really IS a force for evil, or that the  Adversary can use those who don’t even believe in him for his purposes.

I can’t help but observe that the newest “justice” now sitting on the US Supreme Court is an acolyte of what the press and most of Washington regard as the TWO MOST IMPORTANT issues which could possibly come before that august group of revisionists:  abortion and ‘gay rights’.  Besides being Maximally Politically Correct, what do they have in common?  Not merely that they are both acts prohibited  repeatedly by the Bible; it is that they are things which are literally condemned in the strongest possible terms.

Note how the Rights that were once called “God-given”, and protected explicitly by the “thou shalt NOT” wording of the Bill of Rights, are now — at best, neglected — from freedom of assembly, speech, worship, to the Right to ‘keep and  bear arms’, to what were once quaintly called “warrants”.  But the “new” Big Brother-created ‘rights’ – notably abortion and sodomy- are more important than ANYTHING actually written in the text of the Constitution!

I once referred to such Caesar-ordained imitations of real Rights as “privileges”, because they were granted by government, rather than the God of Abraham, Isaac, and  Jacob.  But that doesn’t go far enough.  So far as the prince of this world is concerned – they are Sacraments.

No wonder our real Father tells us we are to be so hard on such lying “mighty ones” and their false priests.

————————————–

* As the Declaration of Independence made very clear in its opening paragraphs.

** I personally find the ISR translation of The Scriptures to be my own preferred rendering of these passages, because of their faithfulness to the concepts in the original Hebrew.  At one time, based on renderings like the KJV/NKJV, I concluded that these warnings pertained only to obviously false gods, or pagan practices, like Easter (Ishtar) eggs and Sol Invictus Mithra-related Xmas ‘traditions’.

Posted in Come out of her...., torah, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 4 Comments